Source

善行無轍迹，善言無瑕讁；善數不用籌策；善閉無關楗而不可開，善結無繩約而不可解。是以聖人常善救人，故無棄人；常善救物，故無棄物。是謂襲明。故善人者，不善人之師；不善人者，善人之資。不貴其師，不愛其資，雖智大迷，是謂要妙。

Glossary

善

skillful (adverbial)

妙

mystery

常

constantly

救

save

明

illumination

要

essential

言

words

Translation Notes

1. "Skillful action leaves no wheel tracks." (善行無轍迹) — Alternatives considered: Skillful action leaves no traces · A more literal “no ruts/tracks are made” · Chose present rendering because “Wheel tracks” preserves the vehicular metaphor and avoids diluting the extended parallelism with subsequent material-instrument negations.
2. "Skillful speech has no flaws or grounds for reproach." (善言無瑕讁) — Alternatives considered: Skillful speech is without blemish or censure · Skillful speech contains no fault or accusation · Chose present rendering because The chosen phrasing differentiates the two terms while reading naturally in English and maintaining the epigrammatic cadence.
3. "Skillful reckoning uses no counting rods." (善數不用籌策) — Alternatives considered: Skillful calculation uses no tallies · Skillful method needs no rods and slips · Chose present rendering because “Reckoning” + “counting rods” best balances philosophical resonance with the passage’s material concreteness.
4. "Skillful closing needs no bar or latch, yet cannot be opened; skillful binding uses no cords or ties, yet cannot be undone." (善閉無關楗而不可開，善結無繩約而不可解) — Alternatives considered: Skillful closure uses no bars, yet nothing can open it · Skillful tying uses no cords, yet nothing can untie it · Chose present rendering because The English keeps the strict parallelism and the immediacy of the physical verbs (open/undo) so the paradox does not become abstract.
5. "This is called Concealed illumination." (是謂襲明) — Alternatives considered: Hidden wisdom · Inherent enlightenment · Layered illumination · Chose present rendering because “Concealed illumination” best captures the paradoxical visibility/invisibility relationship and matches the project’s established glossary translation for 襲明.
6. "the good person is the exemplar of the not-good person; the not-good person is the resource of the good person." (故善人者，不善人之師；不善人者，善人之資) — Alternatives considered: the good person is the teacher of the not-good person · the not-good person is the basis/material for the good person · Chose present rendering because “Exemplar/resource” preserves reciprocal dependence and aligns with the Daoist ethos of mutual interdependence rather than moralized domination.
7. "Do not exalt your exemplar, nor cherish your resource." (不貴其師，不愛其資) — Alternatives considered: Do not esteem your exemplar, nor love your resource · Do not value your exemplar; do not care for your resource · Chose present rendering because “Exalt/cherish” gives the line a gnomic ethical force and better matches the paired rhetorical structure of the original.
8. "even if you are greatly intelligent, you will be greatly deluded." (雖智大迷) — Alternatives considered: even if you are greatly wise, you will be greatly deluded · even if you are greatly knowledgeable, you will be greatly confused · Chose present rendering because Rendering 智 as “intelligent” maintains the critical nuance against discursive knowing and keeps 大迷 appropriately forceful.
9. "This is called Essential mystery." (是謂要妙) — Alternatives considered: This is called the essential subtlety · This is called vital profundity · Chose present rendering because “Essential mystery” best preserves Daoist doctrinal density and matches the provided project rendering.

Footnotes

1. "wheel tracks" (轍迹) — The Chinese 轍迹 (zhéjì) literally denotes ruts or tracks made by wheels. In early Chinese metaphor, the image conveys that perfected ability does not leave a “visible trace” (迹) that could be attributed to forced effort or artificial contrivance. Cf. a comparable Daoist negation of trace-marking (e.g., “無為而無不為,” 無為 without leaving its effects as forced traces) in the Daodejing tradition. See also 王弼’s emphasis on “無跡” style understanding of non-forcing (王弼, Laozi zhushu 老子注疏, under Daodejing 3 and related negations).
2. "Skillful speech has no flaws or grounds for reproach" (瑕讁) — 瑕讁 (xiáyì) is a paired binome: 瑕 = blemish/imperfection; 讁 = reproach, censure, or a basis for blame (often glossed with fault-finding or making accusations). Together they signify speech so perfectly apt that it offers no opening for criticism. Du Yu (杜預) in Chunqiu Jingzhuan Jijie notes related vocabulary used for reproach and censure in civil-ritual contexts, which helps fix 讁 as “censure/reproach” rather than merely “criticism” in a general sense.
3. "counting rods" (籌策) — 籌策 (chóucè) refers to practical devices for calculation in early China—籌 as counting rods/tallies and 策 as related calculation tallies or “schemes” written on slips/boards. Here the paradox indicates that true mastery in “reckoning” (數) does not depend on visible instrumentation. For technical background on early tally-based computation, see later expository traditions (e.g., Shu Shu 數書 and Han-period mathematical descriptions), though they postdate the Daodejing. Conceptually, compare the Daoist valuation of inner/latent efficacy over reliance on apparatus.
4. "bar or latch, yet cannot be opened" (關楗) — 關楗 (guānjiàn) denotes gate fastenings—bars/latches/bolts used to secure doors or enclosures. The line’s meaning is intentionally tactile and paradoxical: the strongest “closing” requires no such physical locking, yet it is functionally “unopenable.” In early Chinese moral-political metaphor, this often serves as an image for security through inner order rather than coercive barriers. On 閉 and fortification metaphors in Daoist exegesis, Laozi commentaries frequently relate them to noncoercive governance (無為治).
5. "Concealed illumination" (襲明) — 襲明 (xímíng) is a terminological expression whose literal semantics are debated: 襲 can mean to cover/enfold, to inherit, to repeat, or to come in layers; 明 denotes “illumination”/“enlightenment.” The project’s rendering “Concealed illumination” treats it as an illumination that is hidden or enfolded (present without ostentation). Many Daoist interpreters gloss 明 as luminous wisdom (照/明察), and 襲 as something like “inherent” or “layered/continuing” rather than external illumination. Because commentarial traditions vary, consistency with the project’s established glossary entry is important. (If earlier chapters render 襲明 differently, cross-reference them and keep the rendering uniform.)
6. "Sage (the sage-ruler)" (聖人) — 聖人 (shèngrén) denotes the Daoist Sage embodying perfected moral-ontological insight. In political Daoism, this figure is often implicitly a sage-ruler (治者) whose governance follows the patterns of wuwei. Some translations capitalize 聖人 as “Sage” to mark philosophical archetype rather than ordinary virtuous persons. The parenthetical “sage-ruler” in the English translation reflects the line’s immediate pivot from practical efficacy to universal saving (“救人/救物”).
7. "exemplar" (師) — 師 (shī) in this context is rendered as “exemplar.” The Chinese syntax 善人者，不善人之師 places 師 not in the sense of a mere classroom teacher but as a model or reference point by which the not-good person becomes capable of transformation or provision of contrast. The passage’s reciprocity (“不善人者，善人之資”) further argues against a one-way hierarchy that would make the not-good person a passive object of instruction. Hence “exemplar/model” is meant to preserve the moral-epistemic relation rather than a pedagogical institution.
8. "resource" (資) — 資 (zī) denotes a resource, support, or basis; here it is “what enables” the good person’s functioning. The maxim’s provocative structure defines the good person through the not-good person’s enabling presence (contrast, occasion, or necessary relational otherness). This aligns with a Daoist relational view in which transformation depends on relational conditions rather than moral condemnation alone. For interpretive parallels on 銜/資 as “basis” in classical exegesis, Laozi commentarial traditions often treat 資 as “所賴” (that on which one relies).
9. "Do not exalt your exemplar, nor cherish your resource" (貴／愛) — 不貴其師 (bù guì qí shī): 貴 means to esteem/exalt rather than simply “to assign value.” In received Daoist interpretation, the warning is against turning the exemplar (師) into an object of reverence that hardens into bias, and against treating the resource (資) as something to be emotionally prized or exploited. 愛 in 愛其資 is best taken as “cherish/prize/care for” (ethical-affective attachment) rather than romantic “love,” matching the compact gnomic style. Wang Bi’s exegesis often emphasizes that clinging to evaluative stances leads to distortion of wuwei-based clarity.
10. "even if you are greatly intelligent, you will be greatly deluded" (智大迷) — 智 (zhì) here is “cleverness/intelligence” or “discursive knowing,” not full Daoic wisdom; the contrast is between cleverness and Dao-based illumination. 大迷 (dàmí) is strong language for “great delusion/confusion,” implying that discursive intelligence can become a source of error when it fails to attend to the relational, non-ostentatious mode named in the concluding formulas. Commentarial traditions frequently treat this as a warning against knowledge-based overconfidence.
11. "Essential mystery" (要妙) — 要妙 (yàomiào) is a condensed doctrinal naming formula. 要 denotes essential core or pivot (often bodily metaphorical in origin, later abstracted as “essential”), and 妙 denotes marvel/subtlety that is difficult to articulate. The phrase is commonly taken as marking a crucial insight that functions like a seal on the teaching rather than ordinary instructional advice. Since this phrase is technical within the project’s Laozi terminology, the translation should match the project’s standardized rendering. (If earlier chapters use “essential mystery” versus “profound subtlety,” keep that choice uniform.)

Glossary References

善（in 善行/善言/善數/善閉/善結 vs. 善人/不善人）

skillful (adverbial); good (adjectival) / good person · The passage uses 善 in both senses: as skillful ability (善행/言/數/閉/結) and as moral-social categorization (善人/不善人). Translation should reflect this shift without smoothing the paradoxical logic.

聖人

the Sage · A Daoist archetype; in political-context passages it functions as the sage-ruler. Keep capitalization consistent across the translation.

襲明

Concealed illumination · A technical naming formula; the English rendering should remain consistent within the project and avoid ad hoc alternatives.

要妙

Essential mystery · A doctrinal seal concluding the passage; treat as a fixed technical phrase in project usage.

師／資

exemplar / resource · In “善人者，不善人之師；不善人者，善人之資,” 師 means exemplar/model (not institutionally ‘teacher’), and 資 means enabling basis/resource. ---

Context

This passage is from the Daodejing, traditionally chapter 27, a foundational text of early Daoist thought. The text is conventionally associated with Laozi and usually dated, in layered composition, to the late Spring and Autumn or Warring States period. Its language reflects the terse, aphoristic style of early Chinese philosophical writing, where ethical, political, and cosmological insights are compressed into parallel formulations. In the broader intellectual context, the passage responds to debates about moral cultivation, governance, usefulness, and the treatment of persons deemed deficient or inferior. It argues against exclusion and waste, insisting that the sage finds no one and nothing to discard.

The passage presumes a classical Chinese world in which counting rods, door fastenings, knots, cords, and contracts were ordinary reference points. 籌策 evokes calculation by bamboo tallies or counting rods; 關楗 evokes bars and bolts used to secure gates; 繩約 and 結 evoke binding, tying, or covenantal fastening. These concrete images support a Daoist paradox: the highest efficacy works without visible apparatus. The terms 人 and 物 together suggest an inclusive vision of governance and care extending from human beings to the myriad things. The relation of 善人 and 不善人 also engages broader Warring States concerns with teaching, exemplarity, moral transformation, and the social value of those not yet cultivated. In Daoist context, this is not simply a pedagogical hierarchy but an interdependence that softens moral absolutism.

Themes

1. Effortless efficacy The opening sequence presents ideal action as leaving no trace and ideal skill as operating without reliance on overt instruments. This exemplifies the Daoist valuation of subtle, unforced efficacy.
2. Non-abandonment The sage is said to be good at saving people and things, and therefore discards none. The point is ethical, political, and ontological: true wisdom wastes nothing.
3. Relational interdependence of good and not-good The good person and the not-good person are defined in reciprocal terms. The cultivated person serves as exemplar, while the uncultivated person provides the occasion, material, or resource through which goodness is exercised and tested.
4. Paradoxical illumination The phrase 襲明 names a mode of understanding that is not flashy or externally displayed. Illumination is present precisely in hidden, enfolded, or inherited form.
5. Subversion of moral hierarchy Although the text distinguishes 善 and 不善, it resists contempt for the latter. To fail to esteem the exemplar or cherish the resource is to fall into profound confusion, showing that moral categories must not harden into exclusion.

Idioms

1. 善行無轍迹 A famous formulation meaning that truly skillful action leaves no ruts or visible traces. It has become emblematic of Daoist non-ostentatious mastery.
2. 善言無瑕讁 Good speech is free of flaw and censure. The phrase suggests utterance so apt and whole that it gives no opening for reproach.
3. 善數不用籌策 Good reckoning needs no counting rods. The line uses a practical image to describe intuitive mastery beyond dependence on external devices.
4. 善閉無關楗而不可開 Good closing requires no bolt or bar, yet cannot be opened. It is a paradox of invisible security, often cited to describe the strongest protection as non-material or non-coercive.
5. 善結無繩約而不可解 Good binding uses no cords or pledges, yet cannot be undone. The phrase extends the paradox of efficacy without visible means to relation, commitment, or integration.
6. 常善救人，故無棄人；常善救物，故無棄物 A celebrated statement of the sage's refusal to discard people or things. It is often cited in discussions of inclusive care and the Daoist rejection of waste.
7. 不善人者，善人之資 The not-good person is the resource of the good person. This compact and provocative maxim underscores reciprocal moral dependence rather than one-sided condemnation.
8. 是謂要妙 A concluding formula meaning something like 'this is called the essential mystery' or 'the crucial subtlety.' It marks the teaching as a compressed doctrinal insight rather than a merely practical tip.

Literary Devices

1. Extended parallelism The passage opens with five tightly parallel clauses introduced by 善, creating rhythmic accumulation and reinforcing the idea of mastery across action, speech, calculation, closure, and binding.
2. Paradox Doors are secured without bolts, bonds hold without cords, and skill works without tools. These paradoxes are central to Daoist expression and should not be over-rationalized away.
3. Concrete analogy Abstract wisdom is conveyed through familiar material objects such as wheel tracks, counting rods, gate-bars, and knots. The analogies ground philosophy in ordinary experience.
4. Gradational structure The text moves from individual capacities to sage governance, then to a relational ethical maxim, and finally to a doctrinal summary. The progression gives the aphorisms argumentative coherence.
5. Antithetical pairing 善人 and 不善人 form an apparently opposed pair, but the text uses the pair to reveal mutual dependence rather than simple binary opposition.
6. Gnomic closure formulas Phrases such as 是謂襲明 and 是謂要妙 function as doctrinal seals. They summarize and elevate the preceding discussion into named insight.

Translation Challenges

1. 善行無轍迹 — 轍迹 literally refers to wheel ruts or tracks; the translator must decide whether to preserve the vehicular image explicitly or generalize to 'traces.' 行 may mean conduct, action, or going; the choice affects whether the line sounds ethical, practical, or both.
2. 善言無瑕讁 — 瑕 and 讁 form a difficult binome: blemish and censure/reproach. English must capture both inner flawlessness and freedom from external grounds for blame. 善言 may mean good speech, apt speech, or skill in speaking; the translator must avoid making it sound merely rhetorical or ornamental.
3. 善數不用籌策 — 數 can mean calculation, reckoning, method, or even strategic ordering. Context favors calculation, but a wider resonance may be worth preserving. 籌策 are counting rods/tallies, not abstract 'plans' here; using too modern or too vague a rendering loses the concrete image.
4. 善閉無關楗而不可開 — 關楗 are physical fastenings such as bars, bolts, or latches; the translator should keep the tactile, material sense. The paradox should remain crisp: no visible fastening, yet impossible to open. Over-explanation weakens the aphoristic force.
5. 善結無繩約而不可解 — 結 may mean tying, binding, joining, or forming a bond; all are relevant. 約 can suggest cord, binding agreement, or constraint. The translator must decide whether the line is purely physical or also relational and ethical.
6. 常善救人，故無棄人；常善救物，故無棄物 — 救 may be rescue, save, preserve, or make good use of. 'Rescue' can sound too dramatic, while 'save' may sound theological; context suggests effective care or salvaging. 物 can mean things, beings, creatures, or the myriad entities. The translator should preserve the breadth without sounding awkward.
7. 是謂襲明 — 襲明 is a technical and contested phrase. 襲 may suggest covering, enfolding, inheriting, repeating, or hidden possession. The established project rendering must be checked and used consistently, whether 'concealed illumination,' 'hidden wisdom,' or another prior choice. Because the phrase is terminological, the translator should avoid ad hoc variation and may need a note if the literal sense remains opaque in English.
8. 故善人者，不善人之師；不善人者，善人之資 — 師 can mean teacher, master, exemplar, or model. In light of the didactic and consistency concerns, 'exemplar' or 'model' may better fit project terminology than 'teacher.' 資 can mean resource, aid, material, basis, or that from which one learns. The English should show reciprocal usefulness without demeaning the not-good person as mere object. The syntax is elegantly balanced; the translation should preserve the antiphonal structure.
9. 不貴其師，不愛其資，雖智大迷 — 貴 is not merely 'value' in a modern abstract sense; depending on project glossary, 'esteem' or 'exalt' may be preferred. The choice affects the social and evaluative nuance. 愛 may be cherish, prize, care for, or love. 'Love' may sound too emotive; 'cherish' often fits the compact ethical tone. 智 can mean cleverness or intelligence rather than full wisdom. The line warns that even the intelligent may be deeply deluded. 大迷 is strong and should not be softened; it means profound or great confusion/delusion.
10. 是謂要妙 — 要妙 is a compact technical expression meaning the crucial subtlety, essential mystery, or vital marvel. The exact established rendering in the project should be matched consistently. The phrase closes the passage with doctrinal weight; the translation should sound lapidary and conclusive.

Technical Terms

1. 善行 (Daoist praxis): Skillful action leaves no ruts/wheelmarks; metaphor for acting in harmony with nature without forcing outcomes. - Translation: Render the skill (善) and the absence of traces through fluent paradox. Prefer 'skillful walking' or 'adept action'. Note parallel construction with subsequent 善 phrases.
2. 善言 (Daoist praxis): Skillful speech has no flaws to criticize; implies natural, non-confrontational words. - Translation: Emphasize flawless expression that avoids blame. 'Skillful words' or 'true speaking' preserves Daoist resonance.
3. 聖人 (Daoist philosophy): The Sage embodying wuwei (無為) who paradoxically 'saves' by letting inherent qualities flourish. - Translation: Standardized as 'the Sage' across most translations. Capitalize to denote philosophical archetype (cf. reviewer consistency requirements).
4. 襲明 (Daoist philosophy): 'Double enlightenment'; wisdom that preserves itself by appearing inconspicuous, avoiding ostentation. - Translation: Project-consistent rendering essential: cross-reference earlier chunks for established translation. Potential options: 'hidden wisdom' (most literal), 'inherent enlightenment' (philosophical), or 'concealed illumination' (poetic). Reviewer noted potential variation requiring standardization.
5. 要妙 (Daoist philosophy): 'Essential subtlety'; deep mystery that embodies the Taoist paradox of achieving through non-action. - Translation: Requires project-wide uniformity. If previous usage exists (e.g., 'essential mystery', 'profound subtlety'), replicate. Otherwise adopt 'essential mystery' per feedback validation.
6. 善人 (Ethical framework): The good person as moral exemplar (not pedagogue) for the un-good. - Translation: Render 'good person' simply. Avoid 'saintly person' to preserve contrast with Sage (聖人).
7. 不善人 (Ethical framework): The un-good person as learning material for the good; 'resource' to cultivate wisdom. - Translation: 'Not-good person' preserves moral relativity and avoids dualistic 'evil' that contradicts non-duality.

Ambiguous Terms

1. 善 — 90% confidence - Possible meanings: `skillful (adverbial)` · `morally good (adjective)` - Resolution: In phrases like 善行 and 善言, it means 'skillful'; in 善人 and 不善人, it means 'morally good'; in 常善救人, it reprises adverbial 'skillfully'. The project should differentiate these nuances.
2. 貢 — 80% confidence - Possible meanings: `fault-finding` · `criticism` · `reproach` - Resolution: Derived from 貢 (divining rod), here contextually extended to mean 'criticism' or 'fault-finding'. Parallel structure with 瑕 (岡瑜) suggests semantic unity in 'flawed words'. Prefer 'flawed criticism'.

Glossing Notes

Chapter 27 of the Daodejing (c. 4th century BCE). Foundational Taoist text using parallelism to convey natural action and non-discrimination. Translation requires nuanced rendering of 善 for both 'skillful' (adverbial) and 'virtuous' (adjectival) senses, precise handling of core concepts 襲明 and 要妙 per project conventions (襲明: 'hidden wisdom'/'inherent understanding'/要妙: 'essential mystery'/'profound subtlety'), and strict attention to project-required 師 as 'exemplar' (not 'teacher'), 貸 as 'exalt' (not 'value'). Syntax should match the text's minimalism while allowing philosophical depth. Key concepts to capitalize/phrase per project's Taoism lexicon standards. Reviewer feedback incorporated throughout.

Translation Principles

1. Preserve the fivefold opening parallelism with repeated 'good at...' or an equivalent patterned syntax; the rhetorical accumulation is essential to the passage's force.
2. Retain the paradoxes plainly and compactly. Do not explain away lines such as 'good closing uses no bolts' within the translation itself.
3. Keep concrete material images concrete: wheel tracks, counting rods, bars or bolts, cords or knots. Avoid flattening them into abstract paraphrase.
4. Render 師 consistently with the project's established preference, likely 'exemplar' or 'model' rather than 'teacher,' to maintain doctrinal and stylistic coherence.
5. Render 貴 consistently with the project's established preference, likely 'esteem' or 'exalt' rather than 'value,' especially in the phrase 不貴其師.
6. Check prior project usage for 襲明 and 要妙 and match the exact established renderings throughout; these are technical terms and should not drift between chapters.
7. Preserve the reciprocal structure of 'the good person' and 'the not-good person' without moralizing expansion. The point is interdependence, not simple condemnation.
8. Maintain a concise, gnomic English register. The final naming formulas should sound like doctrinal seals, not explanatory prose.

Segmentation

1. 善行無轍迹， `clause`
2. 善言無瑕讁； `clause`
3. 善數不用籌策； `clause`
4. 善閉無關楗而不可開， `clause`
5. 善結無繩約而不可解。 `clause`
6. 是以聖人常善救人， `sentence`
7. 故無棄人； `clause`
8. 常善救物， `clause`
9. 故無棄物。 `clause`
10. 是謂襲明。 `sentence`
11. 故善人者，不善人之師； `sentence`
12. 不善人者，善人之資。 `sentence`
13. 不貴其師， `clause`
14. 不愛其資， `clause`
15. 雖智大迷， `clause`
16. 是謂要妙。 `sentence`

Segmentation Notes

Segmentation follows the text’s strong parallelism (善...無...；善...而不可...；常善救...故無棄...；X者...Y之Z；不...其...不...其...雖...；是謂...) and uses grammatical markers such as 是以/故 (causal connectors), 而 (contrast/result), 無/不 (negation), 之 (relational/genitive), 者 (topic/frame), 雖 (concession), and 是謂 (definition). Potential ambiguity is limited to whether some comma-separated units are clauses vs. full sentences in the two balanced 者... constructions, but parallel syntax supports treating each 者... + relational NP as its own sentence unit.

Tone & Style

The tone is lapidary, confident, and paradoxically didactic. The opening lines are crisp and almost epigrammatic, showcasing serene mastery through compact images. The middle section shifts into an ethical-political register, broadening from skill to sage governance and universal non-abandonment. The final lines become more pointed and admonitory: failure to esteem the exemplar and cherish the resource leads to deep confusion. The concluding formulas give the whole passage a deliberately oracular authority.

The style is classic Daodejing prose: terse, aphoristic, heavily patterned, and semantically dense. It relies on parataxis rather than explicit logical connectors, though the progression is carefully controlled. Repetition of 善 creates incantatory momentum, while concrete images carry philosophical abstraction. The register is high but not ornate, preferring austere compression, balanced syntax, and paradox over discursive explanation.

None

Terminology

師

exemplar

貴

esteem

襲明

hidden wisdom

要妙

essential mystery

Terminography Notes

Four cross-chunk items should be standardized for consistency: 師 (standardize as “exemplar”), 貴 (standardize as “esteem”), 襲明 (standardize as “hidden wisdom”), and 要妙 (standardize as “essential mystery”). These are polysemous and/or technical formulae whose alternate renderings (“teacher/value,” “concealed illumination,” “essential subtlety/profound mystery”) could create downstream drift and weaken project-wide terminological coherence.

Entities

襲明

Concealed illumination

要妙

Essential mystery