Source

將欲歙之，必固張之；將欲弱之，必固強之；將欲廢之，必固興之；將欲奪之，必固與之。是謂微明。柔弱勝剛強。魚不可脫於淵，國之利器不可以示人。

Glossary

勝

conquers

固

must first

奪

take away

歙

close

淵

the deep pool

脫

slip free

利器

sharp instruments

剛強

rigid strength

微明

Subtle clarity

柔弱

softness

Translation Notes

1. "將欲歙之，必固張之；將欲弱之，必固強之；將欲廢之，必固興之；將欲奪之，必固與之。" (將欲歙之，必固張之；將欲弱之，必固強之；將欲廢之，必固興之；將欲奪之，必固與之。) — Alternatives considered: If one wishes to contract it, one must assuredly expand it; … · When one intends X, first perform the opposite Y; … (tactic-like phrasing) · Chose present rendering because The selected rendering balances (i) fidelity to parallelism and (ii) the project’s established approach of avoiding overexplanation in the main translation. It also keeps the paradox from sounding like explicit step-by-step manipulation by using “about to” and “must first,” which suggests a patterned process rather than a mere cynical technique.
2. "是謂微明" (是謂微明) — Alternatives considered: subtle illumination · hidden brilliance · subtle manifestation · Chose present rendering because “Subtle clarity” preserves both semantic components (微 as subtle/hidden; 明 as clarity/brightness) while aligning with the consistent translation choice demanded by the project.
3. "柔弱勝剛強" (柔弱勝剛強) — Alternatives considered: Soft weakness defeats rigid strength · Yielding prevails over hardness and power · Chose present rendering because The chosen rendering retains (i) the maxim-like compression of the Chinese and (ii) consistency with the project’s guidelines, while ensuring that the Daoist positive valence of 柔弱 is clear to English readers.
4. "魚不可脫於淵；國之利器不可以示人" (魚不可脫於淵；國之利器不可以示人) — Alternatives considered: Fish cannot escape from the abyss; the state’s powerful tools must not be displayed · A fish cannot leave its water; the state’s weapons may not be revealed · Chose present rendering because The translation aims to keep the concrete natural metaphor (fish/water/deep pool) while preserving the closing political counsel’s ambiguity—consistent with Daoist style, where natural imagery is pressed into statecraft without forcing a single technical referent for 利器.

Footnotes

1. "If one is about to contract it, one must first expand it" (歙／張) — The verb 歙 (歙/歛) is paired with 張. Many interpreters take the clause as a paradoxical statement about cyclical transformation: expansion (張) precedes and conditions contraction (歙). On 歙, the Shuowen gloss 縮也 (“to shrink/contract”) supports rendering it as “contract/close.” For the interpretive schema “desire one outcome, but accomplish it by first doing its opposite,” see the Daodejing’s broader pattern of reversal in early commentary tradition; for example, Wang Bi (王弼, 226–249) reads such lines as describing the operation of 道 rather than a mere tactic. Here the English keeps parallel reversal logic: “contract” is achieved by “expand.”
2. "if one is about to weaken it, one must first strengthen it" (弱／強；必固) — 弱 (weak/soft) is balanced with 強 (strong/rigid). The sequence “weaken/strengthen” is part of a fourfold parallel set (contract/expand; weaken/strengthen; cast down/raise up; take away/give). The English rendering preserves the paired antithesis and the recurring adverbial 必固 in the original, which functions to make the reversal pattern sound categorical—less like “might” and more like “must/assuredly.”
3. "if one is about to cast it down, one must first raise it up" (廢／興) — 廢 can denote “to discard,” “to set aside,” or “to ruin/collapse,” and is balanced here with 興, which commonly means “to rise,” “to promote,” or “to restore.” The pair is therefore not merely semantic but structural: both participate in the same reversal logic already signaled by歙/張 and 弱/強. English “cast it down/raise it up” preserves both the rhetorical symmetry and the movement from apparent decline to preparatory increase.
4. "if one is about to take from it, one must first give to it" (奪／與) — 奪 is classically glossed as “to take away, wrest,” and is balanced with 與 (“to give”). The paired verbs instantiate the same structural reversal: taking (奪) is preceded by giving (與). This does not require assuming explicit violence; rather, the point is that power over outcomes is indirect—effects of deprivation are achieved by first engaging the opposite relational act. English “take from/give to” keeps the same grammatical frame and clarifies the reversal relationship.
5. "This is called Subtle clarity" (微明；是謂) — 微明 is a compressed technical expression in Daoist usage. 微 (“subtle/hidden”) qualifies 明 (“brightness/illumination”), yielding “subtle clarity”—not literal “illumination,” but a refined discernment of patterns that are not yet manifest. The translation’s capitalization matches the project’s established terminology for this term (Subtle clarity). The formula 是謂 (“this is called…/this is what is called…”) functions to label the insight just articulated, giving doctrinal assurance rather than introducing a new argument.
6. "Softness conquers hardness" (柔弱／剛強；勝) — 柔弱 and 剛強 are antithetical paired compounds. In Daodejing tradition, 柔弱 is a virtue-like quality (pliancy/supple weakness) rather than merely “frailty,” while 剛強 denotes hardness and unyielding strength. The verb 勝 here is rendered “conquers” to preserve the maxim’s proverbial force and its established translation in this project. The same maxim appears as an independent statement in Daodejing ch. 78: “天下莫柔弱於水…柔弱勝剛強.” The parallel reinforces that this passage’s political imagery should be read through a broader Daoist ethic of yielding effectiveness.
7. "Fish cannot slip free of the deep pool" (脫於淵) — 脫 here means “to slip free/escape,” and 淵 denotes a specific kind of deep watery place. The image is naturalistic—fish survive only within their sustaining medium—yet it is immediately pressed into political metaphor: rulers should not expose or release from concealment the effective “conditions” that make governance work. English “slip free” and “deep pool” preserve the sense of dangerous separation from a life-sustaining environment.
8. "a state's sharp instrument may not be shown to others" (利器；示人) — 利器 is literally “sharp instruments,” but its immediate referent is debated in commentary: at minimum it evokes weapons, yet Daoist political reading often broadens it to include strategic and coercive means by which a state maintains order. The line’s prohibition 不可以示人 (“may not be shown to others/people”) should be taken normatively as a warning against ostentation of power: displaying coercive advantage invites counteraction. The English preserves the literal metaphor (“sharp instruments”) while using “State’s” to signal the political scope implied by 國.

Glossary References

微明

Subtle clarity · A Daoist compound indicating discerning the subtle, not-yet-manifest logic of transformation; often understood as hidden illumination/clarity rather than literal light.

柔弱勝剛強

Softness conquers hardness · A widely cited Daodejing maxim. 柔弱 denotes pliant/supple weakness, not mere frailty; 剛強 denotes rigidity and unyielding strength.

利器

sharp instruments · Literally “sharp instruments/tools.” In Daoist political readings it can refer to weapons but may extend to coercive or strategic means of governance that should be kept concealed.

脫於淵

slip free of the deep pool · 脫 conveys escaping/slipping free; 淵 evokes a watery deep pool (a life-sustaining environment). The phrase grounds the subsequent political metaphor. ---

Context

This passage is from chapter 36 of the Daodejing (Tao Te Ching), a foundational text of early Chinese philosophy traditionally attributed to Laozi and generally dated, in composite form, to the late Spring and Autumn or Warring States period. The chapter belongs to the text's political and philosophical discourse on reversal, non-coercive action, and the paradoxical dynamics by which apparent weakness proves more effective than overt force. In early imperial and pre-imperial reception, the passage was often read both as a statement of cosmological pattern and as advice on rulership and statecraft.

The passage reflects a broader early Chinese worldview in which processes reverse into their opposites and efficacy often lies in concealment, restraint, and indirect action. Its political language assumes the world of competing states, where rulers guarded strategic advantages and where the display of power could itself invite danger. The image of fish remaining in the deep pool draws on familiar natural observation: life thrives when it stays within its proper sustaining medium. The phrase 國之利器 refers not only to literal weapons but also, in traditional commentary, to the state's effective means of control, including military strength, strategic advantage, and even the subtle instruments of governance that should not be ostentatiously displayed.

Themes

1. Reversal as the logic of change The opening sequence presents a recurring Daoist principle: things moving toward one condition often pass through or depend upon its apparent opposite. Expansion precedes contraction, strengthening precedes weakening, flourishing precedes decline, and giving precedes taking.
2. Subtle clarity and hidden causality The statement 是謂微明 identifies insight into these indirect processes as a refined kind of understanding. It is not obvious brilliance but subtle clarity: the ability to perceive latent tendencies before they become visible outcomes.
3. Softness conquers hardness The maxim 柔弱勝剛強 expresses one of the Daodejing's central paradoxes. What is yielding, pliant, and seemingly weak proves ultimately more enduring and effective than what is rigid and forceful.
4. Political restraint and concealment The final lines shift from general principle to statecraft. Just as fish should not leave the deep pool, a state should not expose its sharp instruments or strategic advantages. Power is most effective when held in reserve rather than ostentatiously displayed.
5. Non-coercive efficacy Underlying the whole passage is the Daoist preference for indirect influence over aggressive assertion. Success arises not from frontal compulsion but from working with the hidden tendencies of situations.

Idioms

1. 將欲歙之，必固張之 A famous paradoxical formulation: if one wishes to contract something, one must first allow it to expand. It exemplifies the Daodejing's teaching that opposite phases interdepend and that apparent movement in one direction may prepare reversal.
2. 是謂微明 This is called subtle clarity. The phrase names the capacity to discern faint, incipient patterns. In translation, 微明 should be kept consistent with the established rendering "Subtle clarity," not "Subtle Illumination."
3. 柔弱勝剛強 Softness and weakness conquer hardness and strength. This is one of the best-known Daoist maxims and recurs as a core philosophical theme across the tradition. For consistency with established terminology, 勝 here should be rendered as "conquers" rather than "overcomes."
4. 魚不可脫於淵 Fish cannot leave or slip free of the deep pool without danger. The saying uses natural imagery to illustrate that living beings, and by analogy political orders, must remain within the conditions that sustain them.
5. 國之利器不可以示人 The state's sharp instruments must not be shown to others. This celebrated line has been interpreted as referring to weapons, coercive capacities, strategic advantages, or the subtle means by which a ruler governs. Its significance lies in the Daoist warning against displaying power.

Literary Devices

1. Fourfold parallelism The first four clauses form a tightly balanced sequence with identical syntax: 將欲...必固.... This patterned repetition gives the passage aphoristic force and makes the logic of reversal unmistakable.
2. Paradox Each opening statement asserts an apparently counterintuitive relation between intention and method. The paradox is not ornamental only; it expresses a fundamental Daoist view of process and efficacy.
3. Antithesis The passage repeatedly juxtaposes opposites: contraction/expansion, weakness/strength, decline/rise, giving/taking, soft/hard. These pairings sharpen the sense that reality operates through complementary tensions.
4. Gnomic maxim 柔弱勝剛強 functions as an independent maxim embedded within the prose. Its compressed, proverbial quality invites quotation beyond the immediate context.
5. Analogy from nature to politics The image of fish and the deep pool provides a natural analogy that grounds the subsequent political claim. The passage moves from observable natural principle to advice for rulership.
6. Progression from cosmology to statecraft The structure of the passage advances from general patterns of transformation to a distilled philosophical label, then to a universal maxim, and finally to concrete political application.

Translation Challenges

1. 歙 — The graph has been variously explained as 'close,' 'shrink,' 'contract,' or 'draw in.' The translator must choose a term that matches the balancing 張 and preserves the pattern of reversal.
2. 將欲歙之，必固張之；將欲弱之，必固強之；將欲廢之，必固興之；將欲奪之，必固與之 — These clauses can sound manipulative if translated as deliberate tactical prescriptions ('if you want to X, first do Y'), but they may also describe an observed pattern of how change unfolds. The translator must decide how strongly to imply agency. 必固 is compact and difficult: 固 can intensify, mean 'firmly,' or indicate 'for a time' / 'first.' English must capture the rhythm without overloading each line with explanation. The four clauses are highly parallel and should remain as parallel as possible in English.
3. 是謂微明 — 微明 is philosophically dense. It suggests subtle, faint, incipient discernment rather than bright illumination. For project consistency, it should be rendered as 'Subtle clarity.' The terse formula 是謂 can be translated neutrally as 'this is called' or more elevatedly as 'this is what is called'; the choice affects register.
4. 柔弱勝剛強 — 柔弱 and 剛強 can be read as paired qualities ('soft and weak' / 'hard and strong') or as near-synonymous compounds. The translator must decide whether to preserve both terms explicitly. 勝 may be rendered as 'conquers,' 'defeats,' or 'prevails over.' For consistency with established terminology, 'conquers' is preferred.
5. 魚不可脫於淵 — 脫 can mean 'escape from,' 'slip free of,' or 'leave.' The translator should preserve the sense of dangerous removal from a sustaining environment rather than simple motion. 淵 is more concrete than a generic 'deep'; it evokes deep water, a deep pool, or the depths. To preserve the established imagery, 'the deep pool' or 'the depths' is preferable to the bare 'the deep.'
6. 國之利器不可以示人 — 利器 literally means 'sharp instrument' and may refer to weapons, but traditional readings often broaden it to strategic advantages or potent tools of governance. The translator must decide whether to keep the literal image or interpret politically. 示人 means 'show to others/people.' In context, 'display' may better convey the warning against public exhibition of power. The sentence can be read descriptively or normatively; English should preserve its aphoristic, admonitory force without overexplication.

Allusions

1. 魚不可脫於淵 — Tao Te Ching Chapter 36
2. 柔弱勝剛強 — Tao Te Ching recurring theme (e.g., Ch. 78)

Technical Terms

1. 利器不可以示人 (Taoist political philosophy): Taoist statecraft principle: conceal coercive power to prevent counter-reaction; metaphorically derived from fish staying in water. - Translation: Translate concretely: 'sharp instruments' but imply governance tools. Use 'State's' to clarify scope; retain metaphor ('not be displayed to others').
2. 欲歙固張 (etc. pattern) (Taoist metaphysics): The cyclical Taoist law where opposites condition each other: one must initiate a contrary action to achieve an end (e.g., expanding precedes contraction). - Translation: Render with parallel syntax. Translate 固 consistently as 'must first' or 'deliberately'. Use semi-colons to separate maxims.

Ambiguous Terms

1. 固 — 85% confidence - Possible meanings: `deliberately` · `temporarily` · `assuredly` · `on purpose` · `must first (in sequence)` · `originally` - Resolution: Adverbial meaning 'deliberately', 'on purpose', or 'assuredly' in these paradoxes; emphasizes intentionality in the preparatory phase. Avoid 'originally' which confuses temporal sequences.
2. 奪 — 75% confidence - Possible meanings: `to take away` · `to seize` · `to deprive` · `to snatch` - Resolution: Translates as 'take away from' or 'deprive' (not violent 'seize'). Parallel to 'take back what is given' in the cycle of giving.

Glossing Notes

Chapter 36 stresses Taoist reversals: apparent negative actions (contracting, weakening) require preparatory expansion/strengthening. Central technical term 微明 must be rendered as 'Subtle clarity'. Key maxim uses established 'conquers' for 勝. Aquatic metaphor 淵 demands concrete imagery (i.e., 'deep pool'). Review requires strict consistency on established terms.

Translation Principles

1. Preserve the strict parallelism of the four opening clauses with closely matched English syntax.
2. Render 微明 consistently as "Subtle clarity" in accordance with established terminology; do not use "Subtle Illumination."
3. Render 柔弱勝剛強 with the established phrasing "Softness conquers hardness," not "overcomes," while preserving the maxim-like brevity.
4. Prefer "the deep pool" or "the depths" for 淵 rather than the more generic "the deep," in order to retain the concrete sustaining-water image.
5. Keep the political ambiguity of 國之利器: ideally preserve the literal image of the state's "sharp instruments" while allowing readers to sense its broader implications for military and governmental power.
6. Do not overexplain the paradoxes in the main translation. Let the terse, gnomic force of the original stand, reserving interpretive clarification for notes if necessary.
7. Maintain the progression from general principle to named insight, then to maxim, then to political application; this structural movement is essential to the chapter's logic.

Segmentation

1. 將欲歙之，必固張之； `clause`
2. 將欲弱之，必固強之； `clause`
3. 將欲廢之，必固興之； `clause`
4. 將欲奪之，必固與之。 `clause`
5. 是謂微明。 `sentence`
6. 柔弱勝剛強。 `sentence`
7. 魚不可脫於淵， `clause`
8. 國之利器不可以示人。 `sentence`

Segmentation Notes

Segmentation is driven primarily by the repeated parallel pattern 将欲X之／必固Y之, which creates strong internal clause boundaries, and by the evaluative formula 是謂… introducing the next maxim. The final two maxims are separated by a syntactic break: 魚不可…於… as one prohibition clause, followed by 國之…不可以… as a second prohibition sentence. No 虛詞 like 也/者 were used to mark boundaries except 是謂 and the genitive 之 and locative 於.

Tone & Style

Compressed, authoritative, and aphoristic throughout. The opening is gnomic and paradoxical, inviting reflective attention; the middle line names the insight with quiet doctrinal assurance; the maxim on softness has the ring of settled wisdom; and the closing sentences become cautionary and political, with a restrained but unmistakable admonitory force.

Classic Daodejing prose: terse, rhythmic, and highly economical, built from parallel clauses, paradox, and analogy. The register is elevated but not ornate. Much of its force comes from syntactic balance and semantic compression, so translation should aim for clarity, compactness, and memorable cadence rather than explanatory expansion in the main text.

None

Terminology

微明

Subtle clarity

柔弱勝剛強

Softness conquers hardness

勝

conquers

淵

the deep pool

柔弱

softness

剛強

hardness

利器

sharp instruments

Terminography Notes

Registered terms focus on cross-chunk consistency for the Daoist political-maxim vocabulary and the two reviewer-flagged inconsistencies: 微明 → “Subtle clarity” and 勝 (in 柔弱勝剛強) → “conquers.” Also registered the aquatic metaphor 淵 as “the deep pool” to preserve imagery, and fixed the softness/hardness paired contrast by standardizing 柔弱 and 剛強. No additional low-ambiguity or single-use items were elevated beyond what is needed to prevent downstream rendering drift.

Entities

微明

Subtle clarity

柔弱勝剛強

Softness conquers hardness

國之利器不可以示人

A state's sharp instrument may not be shown to others

侯王

Marquises and kings

孤、寡、不穀

“I, the solitary one”; “I, the widowed one”; “I, one without grain”

上士

Superior scholar (upper rank)

中士

Middle scholar (middle rank)

下士

Inferior scholar (lower rank)