Source

不尚賢，使民不爭；不貴難得之貨，使民不為盜；不見可欲，使心不亂。是以聖人之治，虛其心，實其腹，弱其志，強其骨。常使民無知無欲。使夫知者不敢為也。為無為，則無不治。

Translation Notes

1. "Do not exalt the worthy, and the people will not contend." (不尚賢，使民不爭) — Alternatives considered: Do not esteem the worthies, and the people will not compete. · Do not promote those regarded as worthy, and the people will not quarrel. · Chose present rendering because “Contend” best captures the broad social competition implied by 爭 in early Daoist political critique, while keeping the triad’s rhythm parallel.
2. "Do not prize goods hard to obtain, and the people will not become thieves." (不貴難得之貨，使民不為盜) — Alternatives considered: Do not value hard-to-get commodities; then the people won’t steal. · Do not esteem rare goods, and no one will become a robber. · Chose present rendering because The chosen wording keeps the social critique visible (policy value → theft) while maintaining the chapter’s compact causality.
3. "Do not display what is desirable, and the heart-mind will not be disordered." (不見可欲，使心不亂) — Alternatives considered: Do not let people see what they desire, and their minds will not be disturbed. · Do not make desirables visible; the mind will not be chaotic. · Chose present rendering because The “display” reading preserves the political logic: governance works by shaping what is presented and therefore what can be desired.
4. "Therefore, in the Sage’s governance, he empties their minds, fills their bellies, weakens their ambitions, and strengthens their bones." (是以聖人之治，虛其心，實其腹，弱其志，強其骨) — Alternatives considered: Therefore, the Sage governs by emptying their thoughts and filling their stomachs, weakening their will and strengthening their bodies. · Thus the Sage’s rule clears the mind, provides enough, reduces ambition, and fortifies the person. · Chose present rendering because The selected phrasing retains the original’s internal balance and image density rather than abstracting away the somatic register.
5. "He constantly keeps the people free from cunning knowledge and desire." (常使民無知無欲) — Alternatives considered: He constantly keeps the people without knowledge or desire. · He constantly keeps the people free from knowledge and from desire. · Chose present rendering because “Cunning knowledge” differentiates 無知 from mere lack of information and better signals the chapter’s critique of contrived intelligence.
6. "He makes those who are clever not dare to act." (使夫知者不敢為也) — Alternatives considered: He makes the clever ones not dare to interfere. · He prevents clever people from daring to act. · Chose present rendering because “Not dare to act” is idiomatic in English and preserves the chapter’s deterrent causality without adding interpretive detail beyond what annotation supports.
7. "Practice non-action, and then nothing will remain ungoverned." (為無為，則無不治) — Alternatives considered: Practice wú wéi, and then nothing will be left untended. · Act through non-action, and nothing will fail to be ordered. · Chose present rendering because “Practice non-action” keeps the paradox legible, while “governed/unguverned” preserves the governance theme that concludes the chapter.

Footnotes

1. "the Sage’s governance" (聖人之治) — “the Sage” renders 聖人 (Shèngrén), a technical term in the Daodejing for an ideal ruler who embodies Daoist principles. The phrase “the Sage’s governance” corresponds to 聖人之治: the genitive 之 marks that governance belongs to, and is performed in the mode of, the Sage rather than being merely an abstract “good government.” For later philosophical reception, compare the Daoist tendency to treat political order as arising from aligning with Dao rather than from moralistic instruction.
2. "Do not exalt the worthy" (不尚賢／賢) — “不尚賢” literally: “do not esteem the worthies.” 尚 (shàng) can mean “to esteem/prize” and 賢 (xián) is not merely “goodness” but “worthies,” i.e., those publicly recognized for talent and virtue in political culture. The negation does not necessarily reject moral excellence; rather, the line attacks the social mechanisms of public ranking that generate rivalry and contests for status. On the second half, “使民不爭,” 爭 is often read broadly as contention (including competition and quarrels) that results from value-policies that stimulate striving.
3. "Do not prize goods hard to obtain" (難得之貨／盜) — “goods hard to obtain” renders “難得之貨.” 難得 (nándé) means “hard to obtain” or “rare/precious because scarce,” and 之貨 specifies “goods/commodities.” Daoist political critique here is causal: when rulers prize scarcity and attach high value to rare commodities, they intensify desire and invite predation, summarized by “使民不為盜.” In many readings, “盜” functions as “robbery/thievery,” but the stronger point is that elite valuation practices manufacture conditions in which criminal acquisition becomes rational or tempting.
4. "Do not display what is desirable" (不見可欲／見) — The Chinese “不見可欲” uses 見 (jiàn). In this context, 見 is best understood as “to display/show/set before (people’s eyes),” not simply “to see.” 可欲 (kě yù) means “what is desirable / what may be desired,” with 可 indicating suitability/availability as an object of desire. The result clause “使心不亂” then describes how making desirables visible destabilizes the “heart-mind” (心): 心 covers both affective agitation and cognitive disturbance. Hence the line is often read as a policy against advertising/visibility of desire.
5. "empties their minds, fills their bellies" (虛其心／實其腹) — “empties their minds, fills their bellies” corresponds to “虛其心，實其腹.” 虛 (xū) is “to make empty/empty out,” and 心 (xīn) is the heart-mind that can be stirred by external valuation systems. 實 (shí) is “to fill/fulfill” and 腹 (fù) is the belly/stomach region, used here as a deliberately bodily counterweight to inner agitation. The paired inner/outer logic (心 vs. 腹) is a stylistic compression: the Sage’s governance reorients people away from restless deliberation and toward basic sufficiency.
6. "weakens their ambitions" (弱其志) — “weakens their ambitions” renders “弱其志.” 志 (zhì) is “will/intention/aspiration,” not merely “goal-setting.” In this political anthropology, 志 is closely tied to striving and personal scheming produced by public competition. The contrast with “strongens their bones” (強其骨) pairs reduced drive with increased resilience, supporting the broader theme that stable order comes from de-amplifying internal motives as much as from changing outward conditions.
7. "strengthens their bones" (強其骨) — “strengthens their bones” corresponds to “強其骨.” The image is bodily and concrete: 骨 (gǔ) literally bones/skeleton, but metaphorically it suggests structural robustness—capacity to endure and to be steady without resorting to aggressive striving. Because the Daodejing repeatedly uses somatic metaphors for social stability, retaining the bodily register in translation helps preserve the text’s deliberate reversal of elite moral/ritual emphasis into a politics of sufficiency and resilience.
8. "free from cunning knowledge" (無知無欲／知) — “cunning knowledge” corresponds to “知” in “無知無欲.” In Daoist usage, 無知 does not simply endorse “not knowing” as ignorance. Rather, it negates a particular kind of discriminating, manipulative, or scheming knowing that proliferates under competitive value-systems. Hence the translation chooses “cunning” to signal the moral-psychological nature of 知 in this chapter: not raw cognition but opportunistic cleverness that supports contention. The parallel with “無欲” reinforces that knowledge and desire are linked as fuel for disorder.
9. "He makes those who are clever not dare to act" (知者不敢為也／為) — “those who are clever” renders “知者” (zhī zhě), literally “know-er(s),” but in this chapter it is best taken as “clever/cunning persons” rather than neutral “those with knowledge.” The verb “不敢為也” in the original centers on 為 (wéi), which can mean “to act,” but in the Daodejing it often implies self-assertive contrivance or interference rather than simple outward movement. The causal structure is therefore: remove the value-stimuli (上文) such that clever people lack the confidence to act/contrive. The particle 夫 (fú) in “使夫知者” adds emphasis (“precisely those…”).
10. "Practice non-action" (為無為／無為／治) — “non-action” translates 為無為. The formula is central and paradoxical: 無為 (wú wéi) in Daoist political thought does not mean passivity or neglect. It means action that is non-assertive, non-contrived, and non-coercive—governing by alignment rather than by forcing. The 為 (wéi) in 為無為 should be understood as “to practice/enact” (i.e., “to practice non-assertive action”), producing a governance that yields comprehensive order: “則無不治,” literally “then nothing is not governed.”
11. "Do not become thieves" (不為盜／為) — The original “不為盜” uses 為 (wéi) with 盜, yielding “not act/turn into thieves.” This is not simply a passive state (“not be thieves”) but an outcome of social conditions (stimulated desire and valuation). The translation choice “become thieves” retains the event-like, causal flavor of 為 in classical Chinese.

Glossary References

聖人

the Sage · Technical Daoist term for the ideal ruler; rendered capitalized (“the Sage”) to maintain conceptual consistency within the Daodejing.

無為

non-action (wu wei) · Daoist governing method meaning non-assertive, non-contrived, and non-coercive action; not mere inactivity.

無知

free from (cunning) knowledge · Negates a Daoist type of discriminating/clever knowing associated with contrivance and contention, not simply lack of information.

無欲

free from desire · Negates acquisitive and socially stimulated desire; paired with 無知 as twin sources of disorder when amplified.

治

govern; order · In political contexts, 治 denotes regulating/bringing order rather than private “control” or mere correction. ---

Context

This passage is from the Daodejing (Laozi), traditionally chapter 3. The text likely took shape during the late Spring and Autumn to Warring States period, with most scholars placing its compilation in the 4th to 3rd centuries BCE, though it preserves earlier materials. It belongs to the intellectual world of early Chinese philosophical debate, when competing schools proposed different remedies for political disorder. In contrast to Confucian advocacy of exalting the worthy and promoting moral-cultivational norms, this passage advances a distinctly Daoist political vision: social contention arises when rulers stimulate acquisitiveness, ambition, and discriminating desire. The chapter therefore articulates an ideal of rulership that reduces artificial inducements and governs through non-coercive non-assertive action.

The passage reflects an early Chinese courtly and political environment in which rulers publicly honored the worthy, prized rare luxury goods, and displayed objects of desire, all of which could intensify competition among the populace. Terms such as 賢 refer not merely to abstract virtue but to publicly recognized talent and merit within political culture. 難得之貨 evokes precious or scarce goods valued by elites, including jade, treasures, and luxury commodities that signaled status. The passage also presumes classical Chinese understandings of the body and polity as linked: to empty hearts-minds, fill bellies, weaken ambitions, and strengthen bones is to reorder both inner disposition and social life. Its political anthropology assumes that desire is socially provoked rather than simply innate, and that wise rulership works by shaping conditions rather than by multiplying prohibitions.

Themes

1. Non-contention as political aim The opening triplet argues that social rivalry, theft, and mental disturbance are not merely personal failings but consequences of how values are publicly organized. Good governance removes the stimuli that provoke competition.
2. Critique of prestige and luxury By rejecting the exaltation of worthies and the valuing of rare goods, the passage questions status hierarchies and luxury culture as causes of disorder rather than marks of civilization.
3. Government through condition-setting The Sage governs not primarily through punishment or command but by shaping the environment of desire and cognition. Political success comes from arranging conditions under which disorder does not arise.
4. Wuwei as rulership The closing formulation 為無為 presents non-coercive action or action in accordance with non-assertion as the governing principle that paradoxically leaves nothing ungoverned.
5. Suspicion of cleverness and ambition The text treats manipulative knowledge, scheming intelligence, and acquisitive desire as politically dangerous. It does not simply praise ignorance, but critiques forms of knowing tied to contention and self-assertion.

Idioms

1. 不尚賢 A famous Laozi formulation meaning not to exalt or over-promote the worthy. Its significance lies in its polemical edge against political cultures that produce rivalry by publicly ranking merit.
2. 不貴難得之貨 Not valuing goods hard to obtain. This became a classic expression of anti-luxury and anti-acquisitive political ethics, warning that elite valuation of rarities encourages theft and social unrest.
3. 不見可欲 Not displaying what is desirable. The phrase expresses the Daoist insight that desire is intensified by presentation, advertisement, and social visibility.
4. 虛其心，實其腹，弱其志，強其骨 One of the best-known tetrads in the Daodejing. It combines bodily and psychological language to describe how the Sage reorders people away from ambition and toward basic sufficiency and resilience.
5. 無知無欲 A compact and influential Daoist expression. In context it points less to absolute stupidity or total absence of all wants than to freedom from cunning knowledge and socially inflamed desire.
6. 為無為，則無不治 A foundational Daoist maxim: act by non-assertive action, and nothing will remain unregulated. The paradox is central to later Daoist political and philosophical discourse.

Literary Devices

1. Triple opening parallelism The first three clauses form a tightly parallel sequence: not exalting worthies, not valuing rare goods, not displaying desirable objects. The syntactic repetition gives the argument aphoristic force and presents governance as a series of removals.
2. Causal political reasoning Each opening prohibition is followed by a consequence clause introduced by 使, creating a pattern of stimulus and response. The rhetoric presents social disorder as produced by policy rather than by innate depravity.
3. Enumerative tetrad 虛其心，實其腹，弱其志，強其骨 uses four balanced verbal phrases to create rhythm and conceptual compression. The sequence pairs inner and outer, psychological and physical, privative and strengthening actions.
4. Paradox 為無為 is a deliberately paradoxical formulation in which governing action is accomplished through non-assertive non-interventionist action. The paradox is not ornamental only; it expresses the chapter's core philosophy.
5. Antithesis The passage repeatedly balances emptiness and fullness, weakness and strength, desire and order. These oppositions sharpen the contrast between ordinary governing assumptions and Daoist reversal.
6. Compression and ambiguity Like much of the Daodejing, the passage relies on extreme brevity, allowing key words such as 心, 志, 知, and 治 to resonate across ethical, psychological, and political registers simultaneously.

Translation Challenges

1. 不尚賢，使民不爭 — 尚賢 can mean to esteem the worthy, exalt the worthy, or promote men of talent; each choice affects whether the line reads as anti-meritocratic, anti-public-honors, or anti-competitive distinction. 爭 may mean contend, compete, strive, or quarrel. The translator must decide whether the emphasis is broad social competition or more overt conflict. The causal force of 使 should be preserved: the ruler's valuation practices are what lead the people not to contend.
2. 不貴難得之貨，使民不為盜 — 難得之貨 refers to scarce and coveted goods, not just any expensive merchandise. A flat translation like 'hard-to-get goods' can sound trivial. 不為盜 literally means 'not become thieves' or 'not act as robbers/thieves.' The translator must choose between a noun-based and verb-based rendering. The line links elite value judgments to criminal behavior; this social critique should remain visible.
3. 不見可欲，使心不亂 — 見 here likely means to display or set before people's eyes, not merely 'to see.' Translating too literally can obscure the ruler's agency. 可欲 means 'desirable' or 'what may be desired,' with an impersonal nuance that should be preserved if possible. 心 can mean heart, mind, or heart-mind. In this context it includes affective and cognitive disturbance, so a translator must decide how explicit to be. 亂 may mean disorder, confusion, or agitation; each gives a slightly different psychological tone.
4. 是以聖人之治 — 聖人 should be rendered as 'the Sage' with capitalization, since it is an established technical term in this text rather than a generic 'sage.' 之治 can mean 'in the Sage's governance,' 'the Sage's way of governing,' or 'when the Sage governs.' The phrase is compact and structurally transitional.
5. 虛其心，實其腹，弱其志，強其骨 — These four clauses are highly condensed and metaphorical. The translator must preserve their parallelism and avoid over-explaining within the main text. 虛其心 is not simply emotional emptiness; it may suggest freeing the heart-mind from restless desires, schemes, or imposed values. 實其腹 literally 'fill their bellies' can sound reductionist in English; yet softening it too much loses the bodily concreteness and political contrast with ambition. 志 may mean will, ambition, intentions, or aspirations. 'Weaken their ambition' is often apt, but the choice shapes the political interpretation. 強其骨 literally 'strengthen their bones' may be taken as physical hardiness, structural resilience, or robust vitality; the translator may need a note if retaining the literal image.
6. 常使民無知無欲 — 無知 does not straightforwardly mean modern 'ignorance.' In Daoist context it can imply freedom from cunning, contrived, or discriminating knowledge. The phrase should be rendered fluently in English; 'keep the people free from cunning knowledge and desire' or 'without cunning knowledge or desire' is smoother than repeating 'without' twice. The translator must avoid making the line sound like a crude endorsement of oppression while still preserving its provocative anti-intellectual stance.
7. 使夫知者不敢為也 — 夫 is a particle that can be difficult to represent; often it is best left untranslated, but its presence adds emphasis. 知者 may mean the knowledgeable, the clever, or those given to shrewdness. In this chapter it likely has a negative sense tied to manipulative intelligence. 為 is ambiguous: to act, to interfere, to contrive, or to pursue self-assertive action. The translator must connect it coherently to the doctrine of wuwei. The sentence may be read as a further result clause from the Sage's governance, and the syntax should reflect that flow.
8. 為無為，則無不治 — 為無為 is the chapter's central paradox and should not be flattened into mere passivity. 'Act through non-action' and 'practice non-assertive action' each capture different aspects. 治 can mean govern, order, regulate, or bring to order. Because the passage is political, the rendering should retain a governance dimension. 無不治 is a totalizing conclusion: 'nothing is not well-governed,' 'nothing remains unordered,' or 'all is well governed.' The translator must balance literalness and idiomatic English.

Allusions

1. 无知无欲 — Taoist philosophical tradition (Late Warring States)

Technical Terms

1. 无为 (Taoist philosophy): Enlightened non-interference principle - Translation: Requires established translation 'nonaction' or 'wu wei'. Must trigger lowercase verb when used.
2. 无知 (Taoist philosophy): Primal simplicity state without cunning intellect - Translation: Must differ from 愚笔. Render 'free from knowledge'.
3. 无欲 (Taoist philosophy): Absence of acquisitive drives - Translation: Philosophical term to be maintained throughout text. Translate 'desireless' or 'free from' desire.
4. 圣人之治 (Taoist political theory): Cosmically aligned rulership - Translation: Must contain 'the governance of the Sage'. Maintain genitive form.

Ambiguous Terms

1. 见 — 90% confidence - Possible meanings: `to see` · `to display` · `to be visible` - Resolution: 要不要迷惑的东西。此处取《宁将》「程度」之意，即「呈现/展示」。
2. 知者 — 85% confidence - Possible meanings: `knowledgeable person` · `cunning intellectual` · `wise man` - Resolution: 这种上文的『慢想』，迯轮底的『敢征』。此处特指罷惥智学机警的本题人物，应译之《智人》。

Glossing Notes

Chapter establishes core Taoist governance doctrine through negating valuation systems. Crucial to preserve antithetical couplets and technical term consistency. All instances of 圣人 must render 'Sage' with capitalization. Phrase 不要 makes the original grammar and syntax.

Translation Principles

1. Preserve the strong parallelism of the opening triad and the central tetrad; the passage's argumentative and aesthetic force depends on balanced syntax.
2. Render 聖人 consistently as 'the Sage' with capitalization, including in phrases such as 'the Sage's governance,' because it is an established technical term.
3. Treat key terms such as 心, 志, 知, and 治 as philosophically loaded; choose English that remains readable but does not prematurely narrow their range without note support.
4. Keep the bodily concreteness of 實其腹 and 強其骨 rather than abstracting them away, since the text deliberately contrasts basic sustenance and strength with ambition and display.
5. Translate 常使民無知無欲 in fluent English, preferably as 'He constantly keeps the people free from cunning knowledge and desire' or an equally smooth equivalent, while preserving the provocative Daoist critique of contrived knowing.
6. Do not flatten 為無為 into inactivity. The translation should convey non-assertive, non-contrived, or non-coercive action rather than simple passiveness.
7. Maintain the concise, gnomic tone of the chapter. Explanatory expansion should be reserved for annotation rather than inserted into the main translation.

Segmentation

1. 不尚賢，使民不爭 `sentence`
2. 不貴難得之貨，使民不為盜 `sentence`
3. 不見可欲，使心不亂 `sentence`
4. 是以聖人之治，虛其心，實其腹，弱其志，強其骨 `sentence`
5. 常使民無知無欲 `clause`
6. 使夫知者不敢為也 `clause`
7. 為無為，則無不治 `sentence`

Segmentation Notes

Segmentation follows the clear parallel triplets introduced by 不… followed by 使… clauses, then uses 是以 as a strong causal connector. The later commands after 聖人之治 form a coordinated series of parallel verb-object phrases. Clauses with 使 and the modal-negative construction end with particles like 也, and 則 is treated as marking the consequence boundary in the final sentence.

Tone & Style

The tone is lapidary, authoritative, and programmatic. The opening lines are diagnostic and admonitory, identifying the social sources of disorder with stark confidence. The middle section shifts into prescriptive, almost physiological political instruction through rhythmic imperatives. The closing lines become gnomic and paradoxical, culminating in a compressed statement of Daoist political wisdom.

The style is classic Daodejing prose: aphoristic, highly compressed, rhythmically parallel, and conceptually paradoxical. It operates through short coordinated clauses rather than extended argumentation, with a register that is at once political, philosophical, and imagistic. Much of its force depends on preserving the balance and sequence of the clauses rather than unpacking every ambiguity in the main translation.

None

Terminology

聖人

the Sage

無為

non-action

無知

free from knowledge

無欲

desireless

知者

the knowledgeable person

不言之教

teaching without words

為無為

to act through non-action

Terminography Notes

Registered the main technical governance terms that recur in this passage family and are sensitive to capitalization and paradox-handling: “聖人 → the Sage” (capitalised), plus the negative-state pair “無知/無欲” and the governance paradoxes “無為” and “為無為.” This prevents drift in downstream renderings (e.g., lowercase “sage,” or replacing “non-action”/paradox formulations with generic substitutes).

Entities

萬乘之主

Ruler of ten thousand chariots

微明

Subtle clarity

柔弱勝剛強

Softness conquers hardness

國之利器不可以示人

A state's sharp instrument may not be shown to others

侯王

Marquises and kings

孤、寡、不穀

“I, the solitary one”; “I, the widowed one”; “I, one without grain”

上士

Superior scholar (upper rank)

中士

Middle scholar (middle rank)

下士

Inferior scholar (lower rank)