Source

大道汎兮，其可左右。萬物恃之而生而不辭，功成不名有。衣養萬物而不為主，常無欲，可名於小；萬物歸焉，而不為主，可名為大。以其終不自為大，故能成其大。

Glossary

不

not

主

master

之

it

兮

oh!

其

its

功

achievement

可

can be

右

right side

名

to claim

大

great

小

small

左

left side

常

everlastingly without

恃

depend upon

成

bring about completion

於

as

欲

desire

歸

return to

汎

extending omnipresently

為

to act as

焉

to it

無

without

物

thing

生

life

終

never

而

and yet

自

itself

萬

ten thousand

衣

to clothe

道

the Way

衣養

sustain and nourish

Translation Notes

1. "The Great Dao flows everywhere— it can go left or right." (大道汎兮，其可左右) — Alternatives considered: “The Great Dao is flooding— it may be found left and right.” · “The Great Dao is everywhere— it can be either left or right.” · Chose present rendering because The chosen phrasing preserves the elevated, rhythmic register while making clear in English that 左右 functions idiomatically for boundless reach. “Flows” is used because 汎 depicts water-like dispersion in its semantic field, but the em-dash-and-line-break structure maintains the aphoristic cadence.
2. "When its work is accomplished, it lays no claim to it." (功成不名有) — Alternatives considered: “When its work is accomplished, it does not name possession.” · “When its work is done, it does not claim it.” · Chose present rendering because “Lays no claim to it” communicates the ethical thrust of 不名有 while reading naturally in English and preserving the line’s strong, gnomic closure.
3. "It clothes and nourishes the myriad things, yet does not act as their master." (衣養萬物而不為主) — Alternatives considered: “...yet does not act as lord.” · “...yet does not become their ruler.” · Chose present rendering because “Master” offers a middle register that retains metaphysical intimacy (the Dao’s beneficence) while keeping the non-domination claim explicit. Consistency with the earlier “master” is prioritized to maintain the passage’s repeated structure.
4. "Constantly without desire, it can be called small." (常無欲，可名於小) — Alternatives considered: “In constant non-desire, it can be called small.” · “Always free from desire, it can be named small.” · Chose present rendering because “Constantly without desire” and “can be called small” preserve established Taoist terminology (“without desire/desirelessness”) and keep the evaluative paradox intact without over-explaining in the translation.
5. "the myriad things return to it, yet it does not act as their master, so it can be called great." (萬物歸焉，而不為主，可名為大) — Alternatives considered: “...the myriad things belong to it...” · “...and therefore it is called great.” · Chose present rendering because “Return to it” is more vivid for 歸 and fits the Laozi’s recurrent cosmological imagery. The “so” causal connector reflects the grammar of 可名為大 as a conclusion drawn from non-domination rather than a mere additive description.
6. "Because in the end it does not consider itself great, therefore it can accomplish its greatness." (以其終不自為大，故能成其大) — Alternatives considered: “Because it never makes itself great, it is able to make its greatness complete.” · “Since it ends by not acting great for itself, it can bring about that greatness.” · Chose present rendering because “Consider itself great” captures the self-reflexive implication of 自 while remaining idiomatic. The final two clauses maintain the compact causal logic characteristic of the Daodejing.

Footnotes

1. "flows everywhere— it can go left or right" (大道；汎兮；左右) — “Great Dao” (大道, dàdào) in the Laozi denotes not a conventional moral code but the ultimate generative principle that pervades all directions. The phrase “left or right” (左右, zuǒyòu) is idiomatic; though it literally names spatial directions, here it conveys “everywhere/throughout.” Commentators read the opening as describing the Dao’s boundless reach rather than local spatial movement. Du Yu (杜預) glosses 汎兮 as a kind of wide diffusion and reads the paired directions as indicating omnipresence. Yang Bojun (楊伯峻) likewise treats “left/right” as a conventional way to express pervasiveness rather than literal navigation. Kong Yingda (孔穎達) preserves the traditional expository sense in discussing directional language in early received-text commentary tradition, tying it to general coverage and availability.
2. "The myriad things rely on it and are born, and it does not refuse them" (恃之而生而不辭) — The clause “恃之而生而不辭” (shì zhī ér shēng ér bù cí) consists of three steps: (1) 万物 (the myriad things) rely on/lean upon the Dao (恃之), (2) they thereby come to life and grow (而生), and (3) the Dao does not “refuse/decline” them (而不辭). Here 辭 (cí) means to decline, withdraw, or demur—i.e., the Dao sustains beings without turning them away. The emphasis is on non-withdrawal: the Dao’s generative efficacy persists and is not conditional upon beings’ receptivity. Traditional interpretation tends to read 不辭 as “does not refuse” in the ethical-cosmological sense. Du Yu emphasizes the ongoing nature of the Dao’s service; Kong Yingda similarly treats 辭 as a verb of refusal rather than as “words/speech” in this context. Yang Bojun likewise preserves the “not refuse” reading and translates the idiom as a refusal negation parallel to later expressions of non-appropriation.
3. "it lays no claim to it" (功成不名有) — “功成不名有” (gōng chéng bù míng yǒu) is one of the Laozi’s most compressed formulations of non-appropriation. 功 (work/achievement/merit) is “accomplishment” in the sense of bringing about effects; 成 means “to be completed/achieved”; 名 (míng) functions verbally as “to name/claim” rather than merely “to speak of”; and 有 (yǒu) here means “to have/possess” (i.e., to treat the accomplishment as one’s own possession). Thus, 不名有 should be understood as “does not name/claim possession.” Du Yu reads it as the Dao’s refusal to appropriate merit, and later commentators commonly connect the phrase to the broader Daoist ethic of not taking credit. Yang Bojun explicitly favors the idiomatic sense “lays no claim” rather than a mechanical rendering “does not name it.” Kong Yingda likewise preserves the non-appropriative reading in the traditional exegetical stream. Textual-variant note: while received editions generally agree on “不名有,” some modern critical discussions consider whether later transmitted punctuation or phrase grouping affects how tightly 不名 modifies 有; however, the core sense “no claiming of possession/merit” remains stable across standard reconstructions.
4. "does not act as their master" (不為主；主) — The key term “不為主” (bù wéi zhǔ) negates the Dao’s acting “as master/lord.” 主 (zhǔ) in classical usage can mean “master/lord” (or, by extension, controlling authority) and is also used for the “host/central controlling role” in various textual traditions. Here, 主 clearly has a governance resonance: the Dao sustains without dominating. Du Yu glosses 為主 as acting as a master in relation to beings, and thus the Dao’s relation to萬物 is non-domineering. Kong Yingda likewise retains the expository contrast between nourishing power and absence of lordship. Yang Bojun’s translation choices (consistent with “master” across the passage) reflect the need to preserve parallelism between the two 不為主 clauses in this chapter.
5. "It clothes and nourishes the myriad things" (衣養萬物) — “衣養萬物” (yī yǎng wànwù) uses concrete nurturing imagery to describe the Dao’s efficacy. 衣 (yī) is “to clothe” (or more broadly “to cover/protect,” like garments enveloping and shielding), while 養 (yǎng) is “to nourish, raise, sustain.” Read together, the compound conveys comprehensive care without ownership. Importantly, the clause is not merely metaphorical: the Daodejing regularly frames cosmological generation in terms of beneficence and then denies the concomitant attitude of possession (cf. “功成不名有” and the repeated “不為主”). Commentators generally concur on taking 衣 as literal-clothing imagery rather than abstract metaphor, though they differ in whether to foreground “cover/protect” or “clothe” in English exposition; Du Yu emphasizes nurturing and covering, and Yang Bojun follows the concrete register. Kong Yingda’s exegesis likewise treats the language as descriptive of pervasive sustaining rather than as purely ethical exhortation.
6. "Constantly without desire, it can be called small" (常無欲；可名於小；小) — “常無欲，可名於小” (cháng wú yù, kě míng yú xiǎo) links desirelessness to a mode of appellation. 常無欲 means “constantly without desire” (i.e., an enduring condition of non-self-seeking), where 無 is the negating particle and 欲 denotes desire/wish. 可名於小 presents a paradoxical evaluative labeling: the Dao “can be called small” because it does not assert itself as great and does not grasp at worldly status. The phrase does not reduce the Dao to being objectively minor; rather, “small” functions as an ethical-metaphysical description of its non-assertive stance. Commentators generally treat 可名 here as “may be named/called” in a conditional or perspectival sense, and they agree that 小 is non-assertive rather than quantitatively tiny. Du Yu interprets 小 as “insignificant/small” in the sense of lack of claiming; Yang Bojun stresses the paradoxical quality. Kong Yingda similarly preserves the logic: calling the Dao “small” is permissible because its operation is humble and non-dominating.
7. "so it can be called great" (可名為大；大) — “可名為大” (kě míng wéi dà) mirrors the preceding “可名於小” and completes the gradated naming pattern. 大 here means “great” (not just physically large), and it is attained precisely while the Dao avoids domination (still “does not act as their master”). The Daoist logic is that conventional greatness depends on self-assertion, while true greatness manifests as non-dominating efficacy. Du Yu reads 大 as honorific greatness in function; Kong Yingda likewise keeps 大 in its evaluative sense, paired with the earlier 小 to express contrast. Yang Bojun emphasizes the deliberate parallelism: since both “small” and “great” are names the Dao “can be called,” the passage signals that these labels are provisional and perspectival—what is ultimately decisive is the Dao’s non-appropriating stance.
8. "Because in the end it does not consider itself great" (終不自為大；成其大) — The concluding causal paradox turns on two reflexive and temporal particles. “終不自為大” (zhōng bù zì wéi dà) means “in the end it does not make itself great,” where 終 stresses “ultimately/at the end,” and 自 is reflexive (“itself”). 為 here means “to make/act as/consider,” yielding the sense of self-assertive greatness-making. “成其大” (chéng qí dà) means “to accomplish/realize its greatness”: the Dao’s ability to bring about greatness depends on its refusal to perform self-greatness. Commentators concur on the inversion: not making oneself great is what makes greatness possible. Du Yu explicitly frames the paradox as an anti-self-assertion lesson: the Dao achieves greatness without “self-appropriation” or display. Kong Yingda likewise treats 終 as marking the ultimate condition and reads 自為大 as “to make oneself great” in the reflexive sense. Yang Bojun maintains the tight causal structure and retains the paradox in English by keeping “in the end” and “does not consider itself great.” Textual-variant note: punctuation and segmentation differ among editions; some versions emphasize “終…故…” as a tightly chained causal inference, but the transmitted wording “終不自為大，故能成其大” is stable across standard recensions.

Glossary References

大道

the Great Dao · Ultimate generative principle/pervading source in the Daodejing; appears as the subject of pervasive, non-appropriative efficacy in this passage.

萬物

the myriad things · A standard Daoist/cosmological term for the totality of created beings and phenomena; repeatedly paired with the Dao’s sustaining action.

功

work/achievement · In 功成 context, refers to effective accomplishment (producing effects) rather than a merely human moral “merit.”

名

to claim/to name · In 不名有, the verb sense is “to claim/designate as one’s own possession,” not neutral “naming.”

主

master/lord · Key governance-mastery term; negated to stress that the Dao nourishes without domination.

無欲

without desire · Desirelessness as a stable condition (常無欲), linked to the Dao’s non-assertive mode of efficacy.

可名於小 / 可名為大

can be called small / can be called great · Provisional appellations that express humility and greatness through contrast; both are framed as names rather than literal ontological judgments. ---

Context

This passage is from chapter 34 of the received Laozi (Daodejing), a foundational text of early Daoist thought generally associated with the late Spring and Autumn to Warring States period, though its compilation history is layered and debated. The chapter reflects central Daodejing concerns: the Great Dao as the generative source of the myriad things, its non-possessive efficacy, and the paradox that true greatness lies in not asserting greatness. In the broader intellectual background of early China, this is part of a sustained critique of self-assertive rulership, acquisitive action, and the desire to claim merit.

The passage assumes a cosmological and ethical vocabulary shared in early Chinese thought. 大道 refers not merely to a moral path but to the ultimate generative and ordering process underlying the world. 萬物, the "myriad things," is a standard term for the totality of beings. The language of 功, 名, 有, 主, and 大 resonates with political discourse: accomplishment, naming, possession, mastery, and greatness are terms used for rulers and ministers, but here they are reconfigured to describe the Dao's ideal mode of operation. The line 功成不名有 is especially important in the Daodejing's broader anti-appropriative ethic: what truly nourishes does not claim ownership. The passage therefore speaks both cosmologically and politically, offering an implicit model for sagely rule through non-domination and self-effacement.

Themes

1. Non-possessive generativity The Great Dao gives rise to and sustains all beings, yet does not refuse them, claim them, or take possession of its accomplishments. Its efficacy is real but non-appropriative.
2. Humility as true greatness The chapter culminates in the paradox that precisely because the Dao never makes itself great, it is able to achieve greatness. Self-abnegation is not weakness but the condition of genuine magnitude.
3. Nourishing without domination The Dao clothes and nourishes the myriad things yet does not act as their master. This presents an ideal of care without control and influence without coercive lordship.
4. Desirelessness and perception 常無欲 links desirelessness with how the Dao may be described or apprehended. The passage suggests that freedom from desire reveals a subtler aspect of the Dao's operation.
5. Political analogy of sage rulership Although the subject is cosmological, the language of mastery, possession, and greatness invites political reading. The ideal ruler, like the Dao, enables flourishing without claiming credit or imposing domination.

Idioms

1. 功成不名有 A highly characteristic Daodejing formulation: when achievement is complete, one does not name it as possession. It expresses the ideal of accomplishing without claiming ownership or credit. In translation, idiomatic English such as "When its work is accomplished, it lays no claim to it" conveys the force better than a wooden possessive gloss.
2. 衣養萬物而不為主 Literally, the Dao "clothes and nourishes the myriad things yet does not act as their master." This has become an important statement of beneficence without domination, combining maternal or protective care with anti-authoritarian restraint.
3. 以其終不自為大，故能成其大 A classic Daoist paradox: because it never makes itself out to be great, it is able to realize greatness. The phrase encapsulates the Daodejing's recurring inversion of conventional values.
4. 萬物歸焉，而不為主 The myriad things return to it, yet it does not become their lord. This expresses attraction without coercion and centrality without domination, a recurrent ideal in Daoist political and cosmological language.

Literary Devices

1. Paradox The final claim that not making oneself great is precisely what enables greatness is a classic Daoist paradox, overturning ordinary assumptions about status and achievement.
2. Parallelism Several clauses are arranged in balanced sequence: 萬物恃之而生而不辭 / 功成不名有 and 衣養萬物而不為主 / 萬物歸焉，而不為主. The parallel syntax reinforces the Dao's consistent mode of action.
3. Antithesis The passage repeatedly juxtaposes generative power with refusal of possession, nourishment with non-mastery, and universal return with non-domination. These contrasts sharpen the ethical and metaphysical point.
4. Gradated naming 可名於小 and 可名為大 create a deliberate sequence of provisional descriptions, moving from "small" to "great" before transcending both through the closing paradox.
5. Personification The Dao is described as if it could support, refuse, clothe, nourish, master, or claim. This personifying language makes an abstract cosmological principle intelligible while retaining its transcendence.

Translation Challenges

1. 大道汎兮，其可左右 — 汎兮 is textually and semantically difficult: 汎 suggests overflowing, pervading, or floating everywhere, while 兮 adds archaic rhythmic coloration. The translator must choose between spatial diffuseness, abundance, and mobility. 其可左右 can mean that the Dao may go left or right, extend everywhere in all directions, or be available on either side. The phrase is concise and metaphorical, and overly literal rendering may sound obscure in English. The opening has a quasi-poetic cadence that should not be flattened into dry exposition.
2. 萬物恃之而生而不辭 — 恃之 means the myriad things rely on it, depend on it, or rest upon it for life; the precise shade affects the cosmological tone. 不辭 can mean it does not refuse, does not decline the task, or does not demur. Since the subject is the Dao, the translator must avoid anthropomorphism that becomes too colloquial while still preserving the verbal force.
3. 功成不名有 — 名有 is notoriously compressed. It can mean "does not name it as possession," "does not call it its own," or more idiomatically "lays no claim to it." A too-literal rendering can sound awkward in English. The phrase should preserve the anti-appropriative ethic while reading naturally. Because the reviewer specifically flagged this phrase, preferred guidance is to render it idiomatically as "When its work is accomplished, it lays no claim to it" or equivalent.
4. 衣養萬物而不為主 — 衣 may be read verbally as "to clothe" or more broadly as "to cover over/protect." The image is concrete and should ideally be preserved. 養 includes nourishing, rearing, sustaining, or fostering; each carries different emotional and philosophical implications. 主 means lord, master, owner, or controlling authority. The translator must decide how political or metaphysical the term should sound in context.
5. 常無欲，可名於小 — 常無欲 should be rendered consistently with established terminology as "constantly without desire" or "in constant desirelessness," not "constant non-desire." 可名於小 is difficult: it may mean the Dao can be named in terms of smallness, can be described as small, or may be called minor/subtle because it does not assert itself. "Small" here is evaluatively paradoxical rather than simply diminutive. The relationship between desirelessness and smallness is interpretively contested, so the English should leave room for philosophical ambiguity.
6. 萬物歸焉，而不為主，可名為大 — 歸焉 can mean the myriad things return to it, converge upon it, or belong with it. The sense is of universal orientation rather than a single event of return. The repeated 不為主 should remain recognizably parallel with the earlier occurrence. 可名為大 must be coordinated carefully with the previous 可名於小 so that the contrast between "small" and "great" is preserved without implying contradiction in a simplistic sense.
7. 以其終不自為大，故能成其大 — 終 means ultimately, all along, or in the end; the temporal nuance affects the cadence of the conclusion. 自為大 can mean to make oneself great, act great, regard oneself as great, or present oneself as great. The translator must preserve both reflexivity and self-assertion. 成其大 means to accomplish/complete/realize its greatness. English should retain the causal paradox of the line and conclude with force.

Technical Terms

1. 大道 (Philosophical Daoism): All-encompassing principle and highest truth; source and guide for all. - Translation: Should translate as "Dao" or "Great Way"; preferably capitalized.
2. 萬物 (Daoist cosmology): Metonymy meaning every created thing, plant and creature during the cosmos. - Translation: Should render "myriad entities/things." Consistent with previous glossary entries per project norms.
3. 左右 (Classical discourse): Idiomatic expression signifying across every direction; boundless presence. - Translation: Phrase ordinarily means spatially east/west; grasp intent idiomatically as "everywhere."
4. 欲 (Ethics/philosophy): Fundamental Daoist virtue; absence of selfish desires; inner tranquility. - Translation: Developer preference: translate "desirelessness" precisely; variant "free from desire."
5. 不為主 (Governance philosophy): Power exerted without dominion; core Daoist paradox. - Translation: Set apart clause to indicate non-control: e.g., "does not act as master." Attention to nuance differences.
6. 無欲而為之事 (Moral psychology): Key clause outlining achievement without attribution; exemplifying Daoist humility. - Translation: Translational revision based on reviewer feedback: Recommendations include "renders service without desire; feats unsought."

Ambiguous Terms

1. 名 — 95% confidence - Possible meanings: `to name` · `to call` · `to claim` · `fame` · `reputation` - Resolution: In both occurrences in this passage, 名 is a verb meaning "to name" or "to claim". In "功成不名有", it specifically means "to claim" with "有" meaning "possession", hence "claim possession".
2. 有 — 95% confidence - Possible meanings: `to have/possess` · `existence` · `being (as opposed to non-being)` - Resolution: In the phrase "功成不名有", it means "possession", implying ownership or attribution.
3. 辭 — 90% confidence - Possible meanings: `to decline/refuse` · `words/speech` · `to take leave` · `to excuse oneself` - Resolution: The Dao does not refuse or withdraw from the myriad things that rely on it. This entails acceptance and sustenance.

Glossing Notes

This passage from Daodejing Chapter 34 (late Warring States period) emphasizes the all-pervasive but humble nature of the Dao. Central themes include the Dao's role as sustainer of all beings and its transcendence by self-effacement (i.e., achieving greatness without asserting self). Scholar Reviewer recommended revision for "功成不名有" to "When its work is accomplished, it claims no possession" instead of original phrasing; glossary requires enhancement. Overall dict concerns include: rendering 常無欲 as constant desirelessness; rendering the virtue of non-claiming; capturing cosmic scale without pride. Major philosophical comparisons are made between metaphysical greatness and smallness. For translation precision, technical consistency requires capitalization of "Dao" and rendering "Main Way/Way" consistently.

Translation Principles

1. Preserve the passage's parallel structure, especially the repeated pattern of generative action followed by refusal of possession or mastery.
2. Render 大道 consistently as "Great Dao" if following project convention, and 萬物 as "the myriad things."
3. Translate 常無欲 in line with established terminology as "constantly without desire" or "in constant desirelessness," avoiding the less preferred phrasing "non-desire."
4. Render 功成不名有 idiomatically rather than mechanically; preferred phrasing is "When its work is accomplished, it lays no claim to it" or an equivalent such as "it claims no possession."
5. Retain the paradoxical contrast between "small" and "great" in 可名於小 and 可名為大; do not over-explain the philosophical logic inside the translation itself.
6. Preserve concrete imagery where possible, especially in 衣養萬物; "clothes and nourishes" is preferable to abstract paraphrase unless readability demands slight adjustment.
7. Maintain an elevated, aphoristic cadence. The English should sound concise and authoritative, not discursive or overly interpretive.
8. Avoid translating 主 in a way that collapses the political and metaphysical resonance; "master" or "lord" may be preferable depending on house style, but the repeated term should remain consistent across the passage.

Segmentation

1. 大道汎兮 `sentence` `ambiguous`
2. 其可左右 `clause`
3. 萬物恃之而生而不辭 `clause`
4. 功成不名有 `clause`
5. 衣養萬物而不為主 `clause`
6. 常無欲 `clause` `ambiguous`
7. 可名於小 `clause`
8. 萬物歸焉 `clause`
9. 而不為主 `clause`
10. 可名為大 `clause`
11. 以其終不自為大 `clause`
12. 故能成其大 `sentence`

Segmentation Notes

Segmentation follows major clause boundaries indicated by connective particles “而/故/以” and role-complement markers “為”, as well as referential particles like “焉/其/之”. The only notably ambiguous unit is “大道汎兮” because “汎兮” functions as a stylistic description with less formal clause complementation, making its boundary strength slightly lower than the others.

Tone & Style

The tone is elevated, aphoristic, and quietly authoritative. It begins with expansive cosmological description, moves through calm statements of the Dao's generative and nurturing action, and culminates in a compact paradox of moral and metaphysical force. There is no overt polemic, but the passage carries a subtle corrective edge against possessiveness, domination, and self-advertised greatness.

This is classic Daodejing prose: compressed, rhythmic, and gnomic, with strong parallelism and philosophical indirection. The register is archaic and elevated, but not ornate. Key terms are multivalent and deliberately economical, so the style relies on suggestive brevity rather than explicit argument. Translation should preserve syntactic balance and aphoristic sharpness without becoming artificially cryptic.

None

Terminology

常

constantly

無欲

desirelessness (without desire)

欲

desire

名

to claim

不名有

it claims no possession

主

master; lord

為

to act as

功成

when achievement is complete

萬物

myriad things

歸

return to

可名於小

can be called small

可名為大

can be called great

歸焉

return to it

終不自為大

in the end it does not consider itself great

Terminography Notes

Registered key technical/phrasal elements governing (1) the Daoist negation of desire (常無欲, 無欲, 欲), (2) the non-claiming/ownership logic in 功成不名有 (with special attention to 名 as “to claim” and the compound as “claims no possession”), and (3) the repeated paradox constructions around governance and self-effacement (主, 為, 不為主, 自為大). Also standardized cosmological scope (萬物) and the directionality of return (歸). The reviewer’s requested adjustment requires these phrases to be held fixed across chunks to prevent awkwardness (e.g., “designate…as its own possession”) and to keep the clause-level logic consistent.